Gender Neutral Bathrooms in Progress
April 28, 2015
After six months of collaboration between The Positive, a task-force of students advocating for gender rights on campus, and Fordham Lincoln Center’s (FCLC) United Student Government (USG) and administration, LC’s and Fordham Rose Hill’s Student Affairs offices are in dialogue about the best way to potentially implement gender neutral bathrooms on campus for the fall of 2015.
Chris Hennessy, a transgender male and FCLC ‘15, spearheads the group and has met with Dean of Students Keith Eldredge and Director of Student Leadership and Community Development (OSLCD) and USG Advisor Dorothy Wenzel, Ph.D, since December 2014. The Positive began their initiative with a survey soliciting students’ gender needs on campus. The survey focused on the potential need for gender neutral bathrooms and was completed by 441 students.
“One of the first things Chris said was he wanted to gather more information [with the survey], and I respected that,” Eldredge said.
“I’m always concerned whenever students are unsatisfied, unhappy, not feeling safe or uncomfortable with any part of their Fordham experience. I certainly want to engage in conversation with them,” Eldredge said. “So I’m excited that a group of students have come forward with an issue.”
According to Hennessy, 90 percent of the students who completed the survey were in support of having gender neutral bathrooms on the LC campus.
The Positive’s goal is not to convert multi-stall bathrooms to gender neutral, but to establish already single stall restrooms as gender inclusive spaces. “Our strategy for attaining them right now, in the short-run, includes changing the signage of all single stall bathrooms on campus to be gender inclusive and to work to publicize those spaces,” Hennessy said. There are at least six single stalled bathrooms on campus currently, two in the lobby of the Law school, two outside McMahon 109 and two on the third floor of the Leon Lowenstein Building.
USG has been partnered with The Positive since January. “Where they see overlap, they want it to be collaborative. USG sends representatives to The Positive meetings and The Positive send their folks to USG meetings,” Wenzel explained. Occasionally, the groups attend each other’s meetings.
In regards to meeting with The Positive, Wenzel responded, “I’m happy to work with students to make a positive change and I’m happy to meet with them to see what we can do.”
USG members welcomed The Positive’s representatives to their meetings with Facilities to discuss moving their initiative forward. Leighton Magoon, USG president-elect, said, “I have been to the Positive’s meeting and I think they are a well established, well focused group that I think can make sustainable change here.”
There were a series of meetings involving members of The Positive, Wenzel, Facilities staff, and Joseph Lagville, president pro tempore of USG, chair of the Facilities Committee and FCLC ‘15. Facilities had to check state and city building codes to ensure the bathroom title change would not be a violation, according to Hennessy.
Leslie Timoney, associate director of campus operations, said there were two building codes pertinent to bathroom signage. One deals with the specific number of bathrooms required for females and males in buildings established by the New York State and another concerns New York City assembly permits.
“The history of bathrooms is totally sexist…I mean, women didn’t have bathrooms in the workplace until 1930,” Timoney continued.“So now there is a specific count of bathrooms in buildings designated for males and females,” Timoney said.
According to Timoney, public assembly permits in NYC require specific male and female bathrooms near public assembly spaces. This is the difference between the restrooms outside McMahon 109, a public assembly space, and Lowenstein’s third floor bathrooms. Changing the bathrooms on the third floor of Lowenstein would not be in any violation of the permit code as they are not near a place of public assembly.
“It’s not just signage that implies that this is a unisex space,” Hennessy said. “This is a proactive and conscientious effort to be gender inclusive.”
Hennessy has received some pushback from students. One student wrote in the survey that if students do not like Fordham’s Catholic ideals, they do not have to attend Fordham. To this, Hennessy responded, “I don’t think that Fordham is so conservatively Christian that they ask us to simply stay silent when we think that something is wrong–when we know that something is wrong.
“Everything that Fordham has ever taught me is that we should always be willing to question the norms around us and then once we have found an answer to those questions and have found that they are undoubtedly wrong it is our absolute ability to change them. Not to walk away.”
Visit fordhamobserver.com to watch more coverage of The Positive.
The Editor-in-Chief has worked with Chris Hennessy in two performances of the Vagina Monologues at FCLC.
UPDATE: April 30, The author of this article changed the number of single stalled bathrooms on campus from five to six, and from one single stalled bathroom in the Law library to two.
Anthony • Dec 3, 2015 at 8:47 pm
Some people aren’t going to understand why gender neutral restrooms are important. But as a trans male who attends FCLC, I can say that this very significant. Using the men’s restroom has always been a bit anxiety provoking for me because trans men are at a higher risk for physical assault just by being in the men’s restroom. Having gender neutral bathrooms on campus would alleviate a lot of the stress that some members of the Fordham community feel when stepping into a gender specific bathroom. This is amazing news and I’m really happy to hear that Fordham is become more inclusive of the trans* community.
Castle • Nov 23, 2015 at 3:47 pm
Gender neutral for those who dont know that they use the bathroom for their reproductive organs. Should be regressive instead of progressives.
Jaime • Apr 30, 2015 at 7:16 pm
But bathrooms are designed to accommodate biological sex not gender. Correct?
Hence why a urinal would be pointless to anyone who is not a biological male. And waste baskets in stalls would be pointless to anyone who is not a biological woman.
Also “gender neutral” bathrooms just means piss on the seats for girls. so have fun with that one.